<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>Discussions of group: Pure TTV (the old fashioned way)</title>
  <link>http://www.ipernity.com/group/29154/discuss</link>
  
  <description>A showcase for genuine TTVs, meaning you made the photo with a bottom camera which is a twin lens camera, and a top camera, which is a digital camera . In other words, you did not create an image  that looks like a ttv.  LET'S BE CLEAR: There's nothing wrong with fake ttvs!!!  Many of them are quite beautiful!!  However,  the true ttv process is an art form unto itself  (just like making a "fake" ttv is an art form unto itself).  There is something about never knowing how the photo will come out of the camera...how the dust on your lens will show itself....how the light leaks in...how the edges of the photo warp and leak.  It's a constant suprise!  This is simply a place to show off your genuine ttvs.</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>http://www.ipernity.com</generator>
  <item>
    <title>the ttv process..what is yours?</title>
    <link>http://www.ipernity.com/group/29154/discuss/11691</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ipernity.com,2007-10-21,topic-11691</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <author>nobody@ipernity.com (NICOLEBRUNI)</author>
    <description>&lt;p class="who"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ipernity.com/home/24063"&gt;NICOLEBRUNI&lt;/a&gt; has started a topic:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="description"&gt;As the group description says, there is nothing wrong with fake ttvs. I like many of them quite a bit. But I'm a ttv purist. I love the process of having a bottom camera with a contraption.  I love how you never quite know how the photo will come of the camera, because it's different every time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I use a Kodak duaflex as my bottom camera ($8 ebay) and a Canon Digital Rebel as my top camera.  I use two macro filters on my top camera.   I often post-process in Photoshop or Lightroom, but sometimes I leave the photo as it came out of the camera. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I crop to 2200 px x 2200 px. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about you?&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    <media:title>the ttv process..what is yours?</media:title>
    <media:text type="html">&lt;p class="who"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ipernity.com/home/24063"&gt;NICOLEBRUNI&lt;/a&gt; has started a topic:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="description"&gt;As the group description says, there is nothing wrong with fake ttvs. I like many of them quite a bit. But I'm a ttv purist. I love the process of having a bottom camera with a contraption.  I love how you never quite know how the photo will come of the camera, because it's different every time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I use a Kodak duaflex as my bottom camera ($8 ebay) and a Canon Digital Rebel as my top camera.  I use two macro filters on my top camera.   I often post-process in Photoshop or Lightroom, but sometimes I leave the photo as it came out of the camera. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I crop to 2200 px x 2200 px. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about you?&lt;/div&gt;</media:text>
    <media:credit role="author">NICOLEBRUNI</media:credit>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>