Discussions of group: Bridges /=|=\

When is a bridge not a bridge?

nobody@ipernity.com (Herb Riddle) — Sun, 20 May 2018 16:16:40 +0000

Herb Riddle has started a discussion:

As a recent newcomer to this group, I quickly contributed some of my many bridge photos. Or at least, what I have always considered a bridge photo. Now, I realise that this group may be in fact a little more choosy than I first thought because some of my bridges are technically viaducts! Looking through the contributions here I see one or two other obvious viaducts but not many. Maybe a little clarification needs to be added by our moderators?

Cambridge Dictionary:
Bridge - noun - "a structure that is built over a river, road, or railway to allow people and vehicles to cross from one side to the other:"

Viaduct - noun -"a long, high bridge, usually held up by many arches, that carries a railway or a road over a valley"

So it seems that I must be OK with my viaducts too.

Any other thoughts?
Herb

Admin´s back

nobody@ipernity.com (ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)) — Wed, 04 Nov 2015 01:59:27 +0000

ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) has started a discussion:

Hi,

just would like to say - I´m back. At first I haven´t much time because a close friend was evacuated for about a mounth because of a fire (in the neighborhood) which I have to supporting mental during this time, and after that´s done and everything is back to normal I had an serious issue with my Mainboard (which is broken).

So I can´t moderate this group (and my others, too) because - well - moderating with a smartphone isn´t this easy because of missing functions in the app and a not really usable mobile version of ipernity. Bah.

So thanks to the other moderators / admins which helps to let this group stay as it is (haven´t looked at the last constributions, but will take a closer look in the next time - it´s the first boot with the new system now. ;-)

Well... so keep posting bridges to this group...

Read yah!

Be prepared: This group will be a spam - free one

nobody@ipernity.com (ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)) — Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:55:17 +0000

ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) has started a discussion:

This group will be a spam - free.

No more
- comment - codes like "Seen in" or "Admired in"
- no awards
- no links to groups inside of comments. If linked or not
- no advertisement for groups, textual or graphic
- nothing else like this, anything like that...

...inside the comment - section.

This rule will be apply in a few days, and the group will went (hopefully just temporarelly) to a moderated one because of this.
I just need a few days until I got the needed free time to moderate it in this way.

There won´t be any further note about this. If you don´t want your photos to be removed within a few minutes (or yourself) from this group you should follow this simple rule from now unlike it won´t be active for the moment.

If you won´t comply to this rule feel free to leave this group by NOW (and don´t forget to remove your already added documents first as well) and be happy with your spaming guys by spaming each other.

This group doesn´t need you to be a fine group which is comply to ipernity´s group-rules which doesn´t need any sentence about spam before you had discovered ipernity as a new space for your group - advertisements.

Cheers.

Suggest documents which should be added to this group

nobody@ipernity.com (ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)) — Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:10:41 +0000

ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) has started a discussion:

Hi,

because members can´t invite photos to this group feel welcomed to make suggestions which photo should be added to this group if you see something which could be fit.

After I´d invited it (if it´s fitting the group - topic) I will delete your proposal so this thread will stay clean.

Thank you for your participation to make this a wonderful group by adding your own documents and providing links to others!

Please post only photos in which the bridge strictly dominate the photo

nobody@ipernity.com (ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)) — Sat, 07 Sep 2013 22:14:12 +0000

ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) has started a discussion:

Hi,

recently some photos are posted where the bridge was (just) somewhere in the background, not clearly visible, far, far away from being in focus or the main-object of the photo.
Sometimes this make sense if you would like to show the whole bridge to get some step backwards but sometimes not (if you shot a pretty small bridge from 2 miles away it could be still visible on the photo - but not as clear as it would fit in a group which is dedicated special to bridges.

Please keep in mind that the bridge should be the part of the photo which was dominating. Best ones are the photos where the bridge is visible already in the thumbnail- others will get a further look and if not fit the topic/rules kicked out of the group, sorry.

333 members

nobody@ipernity.com (ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)) — Tue, 06 Aug 2013 21:58:29 +0000

ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) has started a discussion:

Congrats to

Vera Stevens who was member number 333 of this group. :-)

Please tell your friends about this group if they have documents for this group (and I´m pretty sure nearly everyone will have some). :-)

new group "bridges in hamburg, germany / brücken in hamburg"

nobody@ipernity.com (cps2006) — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:14:42 +0000

cps2006 has started a discussion:

hi everybody,

I would like to invite you to my group
"bridges in hamburg, germany / brücken in hamburg"
www.ipernity.com/group/32349

regards, cps

Please note: The bridges should be the mainpart of a photo/ Die Brücke sollte das Hauptmotiv darstellen

nobody@ipernity.com (ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 04:52:11 +0000

ୱ Kiezkickerde ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) has started a discussion:

Hi,

sorry, but I had to delete a few photos out the group cause the bridge are nondominant to the photo. Not every photo which show a bridge somewhere miles away would be perfectly fit to a group called bridges- you should be able to view the bridge without open the full-size photo just somewhere in the background.
Thanks for your appreciation.
Follow-up: www.ipernity.com/group/bridge/discuss/152145

Moin,
tschuldigung, aber ich habe einige Fotos aus der Gruppe entfernt, weil auf diesen Fotos die jeweilige Brücke nicht annähernd das Hauptmotiv des Fotos darstellte, sondern allenfalls irgendwo ganz weit hinten im Hintergrund zu erahnen war (und das nicht deswegen, weil man die komplette Spannbreite der Brücke ablichten wollte). Wenn man das Originalbild öffnen muß, um überhaupt die irgendwo im Hintergrund befindliche Brücke erahnen zu können, ist das dann irgendwann kein Motiv mehr für diese Gruppe.
Danke für euer Verständnis. :)
Weitere Diskussion in www.ipernity.com/group/bridge/discuss/152145